Current time: 11-23-2024, 03:57 PM
Poll: LR or FA or older incarnation?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
LR
62.50%
10 62.50%
FA
31.25%
5 31.25%
Others (MoA, AA, SL)
6.25%
1 6.25%
Total 16 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Future PACT?
A survey
#16
quad hp those seem deadly when done right but its also a gamble dont you think XD


anyway mukhang lr nga pero wag namang tawaging sayonara lr XP
whargarrblwhargarrblwhargarrbl!

Reply
#17
If both players from the same team do focus fire on one player, It means the other player is free and can attack one opponent attacking his teammate/wingman.

It's like:
A1+A2 >> B1
B1 >> A1orA2
B2 >> A1orA2

HP's will be a problem if they can be hangered. Kaso hindi eh. So basically, we can use our current part regulations on 2on2.
Mas mabagal lang pag masyadong maraming missiles. That's why I think it's better to just enforce a launch limit kahit wala nang bans.
'Signatures are overrated.'
Reply
#18
Even if one guy is free, if two players can properly quad-HP an AC, it'll easily that down that AC. It's like four rapid-fire rifles with high breaking damage (HP does have rifle damage.. high-end solid rifle damage). Well, it's for testing as usual. Nothing's certain until there are test results.
"Numbers are not part of the real world; they're part of something else."

-Prof. Rolly Panopio, UPLB Math Division
Reply
#19
I'm actually ok with that.

I don't think we should be bothering too much with balance anymore at this point in time. It'll be more for fun, right?
Reply
#20
Sana mauilit yun flamethrower/Yasya four AC free-for-all. LOL
"Numbers are not part of the real world; they're part of something else."

-Prof. Rolly Panopio, UPLB Math Division
Reply
#21
We did a 2on2 against 2 AI units las friday.
Walang problema sa regulations...
Just enforce a no part repeat rule, para wala nang problema with dual nix's, HP's and etc...
Ok na after that.
'Signatures are overrated.'
Reply
#22
I want another lr PACt too. Tongue kinda miss playing it already Tongue
Reply
#23
What kind of no-repeating-parts rule?

As in dapat walang common parts between the 2 team mates? Sounds good to me. LOL

EDIT: but in that case, dapat magkampihan na para makagawa na ng team ACs. Tongue
Reply
#24
Would you guys be interested in having another PACT during BYOB2?
It can be our send-off party for LR.

The event can now be BYOB2/PACT5/3rd RR Aniv!!
Reply
#25
Yeah, sige. One last one before we prolly move on to different games/platforms.

PACT 3 or 4 rules good enough or would you guys want to go for the classic 1 AC per person on a best of 3 (or 5) double elimination format like in PACT4 (which IMO gives ample opportunities for everyone to participate)? I'm all for it as long as we use the double elimination format used in PACT4.
Reply
#26
Can you guys add something fun to the tourney? Like the aforementioned Yasya rumble?

Just something for the people who don't really play AC. Just plain AC fun.
Reply
#27
Suggestion lang.

Kung 8 players sumali:

Bunutan kung block a/block b ka. 4 people per block.

block a, 4-way free-for-all. block b, 4-way free-for-all.

Natira sa block a, laban sa natira sa block b.

winner = champion.

Kailangan divisible by 4 ang sumali.

If not, kahit 3-way ffa sa isang block ok lang. Nakatungangang default AC nalang yung 4th player.

--------------

Tutal for fun na lang naman ito diba. So kung 4-way ffa, sobrang random na talaga and skill won't be that big a deal. Fun na lang talaga ang focus.

This'll probably allow for some really unexpected finalists. Tongue
Reply
#28
why call it a sendoff thing naman for Lr? imho it's still more fun than Fa. Smile
Reply
#29
Ganun eh. People always want something newer. Even if new isn't necessarily better. Buhay nga naman.
Reply
#30
heh, if fun is the premise, then why not fewer restrictions then? altho still ban the imba stuff.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PACT Regulations - ACV 1.01 NiX 51 69,505 06-14-2012, 09:05 AM
Last Post: NiX
  ACV PACT NiX 8 15,010 05-08-2012, 07:11 PM
Last Post: farmboy28
  PACT VI NiX 295 351,756 02-25-2012, 02:35 PM
Last Post: Shintetsu
  PACT Regulations for LR NiX 316 413,485 12-18-2011, 12:40 PM
Last Post: atdsutm
  PACT 6 NiX 36 50,140 01-21-2011, 05:46 PM
Last Post: beastkiller
  PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two NiX 143 199,358 10-23-2010, 02:44 AM
Last Post: clonezero
  PACT 5 Discussion Thread NiX 87 146,512 08-05-2009, 10:38 PM
Last Post: Grim
  PACT 4 - Let's go RAVENS! NiX 164 235,841 06-25-2008, 06:44 PM
Last Post: Serene
  LR PACT: Ban Harpy 2? NiX 5 11,854 05-05-2008, 08:44 PM
Last Post: NiX
  LR PACT: Limit Conditionally Banned Parts? NiX 2 7,509 05-05-2008, 08:43 PM
Last Post: NiX

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)