06-17-2009, 10:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2009, 10:35 AM by Moonlight_Raven.)
in my opinion, 2 vs 2 format will be more good..coz it will promote co-op strategy (Armored Core: Tag Tournament...hehehe). it is much like a 1 on 1 combat, but with a twist *raven bonding time... hehehe 
* (i was imagining scenes from CG intro of AC3 
). with regards on regulations, i don't think major revamping should be made (or at least make it more friendly restrictions).
FFA...i dunno... much like a "survivor" strategy..remove the threat..then outwit others..then win 
(personally, i'm not comfortable with that)
suggest:
-one AC entry would be fine
-proceed with the 2 vs 2. random pick is ok, or pick your partner...depends
-at the end of the tourney, have a 1 on 1 duel with your partner...then declares the champ
=^.^=
* (i was imagining scenes from CG intro of AC3 ). with regards on regulations, i don't think major revamping should be made (or at least make it more friendly restrictions). FFA...i dunno... much like a "survivor" strategy..remove the threat..then outwit others..then win (personally, i'm not comfortable with that)suggest:
-one AC entry would be fine
-proceed with the 2 vs 2. random pick is ok, or pick your partner...depends
-at the end of the tourney, have a 1 on 1 duel with your partner...then declares the champ
=^.^=
![[Image: upeo113pr8.gif]](http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/7403/upeo113pr8.gif)
State-of-the-Art
Functionality
Balance
---
"I am more of a Teacher rather than a Pilot"
