05-05-2008, 08:43 PM
Well this poll's obviously been invalidated. I think it's safe to say though that we do agree that there's no real need to limit our conditional bans.
| Poll: Allow only 1 conditionally banned part per AC You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Yes | 0 | 0% | |
| No | 4 | 100.00% | |
| Total | 4 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
LR PACT: Limit Conditionally Banned Parts?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
LR PACT: Limit Conditionally Banned Parts? - by NiX - 04-21-2008, 12:08 AM
RE: LR PACT: Limit Conditionally Banned Parts? - by Grim - 04-21-2008, 12:44 AM
RE: LR PACT: Limit Conditionally Banned Parts? - by NiX - 05-05-2008, 08:43 PM
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| PACT Regulations - ACV 1.01 | NiX | 51 | 84,290 |
06-14-2012, 09:05 AM Last Post: NiX |
|
| ACV PACT | NiX | 8 | 18,049 |
05-08-2012, 07:11 PM Last Post: farmboy28 |
|
| PACT VI | NiX | 295 | 437,920 |
02-25-2012, 02:35 PM Last Post: Shintetsu |
|
| PACT Regulations for LR | NiX | 316 | 503,624 |
12-18-2011, 12:40 PM Last Post: atdsutm |
|
| PACT 6 | NiX | 36 | 60,851 |
01-21-2011, 05:46 PM Last Post: beastkiller |
|
| PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two | NiX | 143 | 243,052 |
10-23-2010, 02:44 AM Last Post: clonezero |
|
| PACT 5 Discussion Thread | NiX | 87 | 176,179 |
08-05-2009, 10:38 PM Last Post: Grim |
|
| Future PACT? | maitreya | 35 | 52,178 |
06-17-2009, 03:57 PM Last Post: Shintetsu |
|
| PACT 4 - Let's go RAVENS! | NiX | 164 | 287,559 |
06-25-2008, 06:44 PM Last Post: Serene |
|
| LR PACT: Ban Harpy 2? | NiX | 5 | 13,803 |
05-05-2008, 08:44 PM Last Post: NiX |
|