I moved my vote to 2 on 2 in support of what most members seem to want. 
I'm really on the fence about choosing and having randomized partners. On one hand the first enables the team styles to really come out, at the cost of seriousness and balance in the tourney. On the other hand, not knowing who your partner is going to be keeps the tournament semi-serious, but the effect of teaming up is lessened because less amount of time is alloted to create strategic builds. Also, it brings up the problem of practicing together, especially if the two participants are far apart physically.
Hmm... that whole statement kind of leaned towards choosing your own partner.
I'm really on the fence about choosing and having randomized partners. On one hand the first enables the team styles to really come out, at the cost of seriousness and balance in the tourney. On the other hand, not knowing who your partner is going to be keeps the tournament semi-serious, but the effect of teaming up is lessened because less amount of time is alloted to create strategic builds. Also, it brings up the problem of practicing together, especially if the two participants are far apart physically.Hmm... that whole statement kind of leaned towards choosing your own partner.
"Let's fight... like gentlemen." - Dudley, SF3
