10-31-2006, 11:35 AM
Looks good Serene but I'm still somewhat doubtful. Put it this way: Using this system, the ACs that Rick and I used still end up in the B-Class division. Most LR ACs will really end up in this division anyway, so this kinda defeats the purpose.
Why don't we do this:
1. Compile all the ACs used last October 28.
2. Apply Serene's suggested rating to each of the ACs.
3. Check how far each AC got in the tournament ranking.
This way, we can see what AC-rating was most dominant.
My suggestion:
1. Create our own grading system based on how many tiered parts are on an AC.
------------------------------------
Regarding the maps:
STRUCTURE is kinda okay with me but like I said, its roof is somewhat low. Hence, ACs packing an MV, MV2, EMPUSA2, Cluster Bombs, or Dual-Back verts will have their backmounts rendered useless... and I don't think that's fair to them.
Why don't we do this:
1. Compile all the ACs used last October 28.
2. Apply Serene's suggested rating to each of the ACs.
3. Check how far each AC got in the tournament ranking.
This way, we can see what AC-rating was most dominant.
My suggestion:
1. Create our own grading system based on how many tiered parts are on an AC.
------------------------------------
Regarding the maps:
STRUCTURE is kinda okay with me but like I said, its roof is somewhat low. Hence, ACs packing an MV, MV2, EMPUSA2, Cluster Bombs, or Dual-Back verts will have their backmounts rendered useless... and I don't think that's fair to them.
