07-19-2007, 06:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-clonezero+July 19, 2007 07:39 am--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (clonezero @ July 19, 2007 07:39 am)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I for one vot for a change in the rules though... it is three acs so... maybe a slight lightening of the rules may be good ...
lol what about map specific acs.... as in acs meant ot fight in one map... including the bnned maps... ( eg anti ecm ac for a high ecm map, or a high ap and cooling for the volcano map ...) just a suggestion... [/quote:f5e306a225]
Sorry man I didn't totally understand that part about the map-specific ACs. Care to elaborate?
However, as for reducing some of the existing part bans, I don't know. Several of us are actually quite comfortable already with the current ban list. But as usual, if enough people want a change in the ban list, then there will be a change. But please direct you suggestions to our PACT regulations thread.
-----
As for a tournament for the older AC games, I don't mind. Wanna have that during the RR anniv? Like MOA, perhaps?
lol what about map specific acs.... as in acs meant ot fight in one map... including the bnned maps... ( eg anti ecm ac for a high ecm map, or a high ap and cooling for the volcano map ...) just a suggestion... [/quote:f5e306a225]
Sorry man I didn't totally understand that part about the map-specific ACs. Care to elaborate?
However, as for reducing some of the existing part bans, I don't know. Several of us are actually quite comfortable already with the current ban list. But as usual, if enough people want a change in the ban list, then there will be a change. But please direct you suggestions to our PACT regulations thread.
-----
As for a tournament for the older AC games, I don't mind. Wanna have that during the RR anniv? Like MOA, perhaps?