12-13-2006, 12:19 AM
My perspective: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eE4QdlU3aI' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eE4QdlU3aI</a>
Twin-Skies' perspective: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbQzIBfdCu8' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbQzIBfdCu8</a>
EDIT: Part 2
TS' view: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBS_O13CIQ8' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBS_O13CIQ8</a>
My view: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSmBRtpwkMo' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSmBRtpwkMo</a>
Yay! A fight vid!!! (More will be added soon. Twin-Skies also says hi to everyone, as he hasn't been able to post recently due to his work.)
Anyway, I changed the legs back to the FA and the EYE3 for the fight, as it allows for better mobility and EN defense, plus allowing the AC to go on to the offensive (I have to go all out against someone like TS), but it can easily be changed back to the EYE4 + 77A whenever I want to.
I'm actualy liking the MV2 because it really makes it harder for the opponent to dodge verts, meaning if you launch one it will get your opponent's attention, which buys the AC some time to get into the proper position to launch a barage of gunfire. On the otherhand, I use the KINNARA + GAR as a surprise-shotgun weapon at mid-short range or as a 'smoke screen' to hide other offensive strikes, the single lock of the KINNARA allows it to be deployed instanstaniously compared to the multi-lock NYMPH + RM3 which takes time before its able to launch a salvo. Well, I could also put ground trorps instead of the MV2 for anti-quad goodness
.
As for option parts, the 77A has inferior stability compared to the FA at around 7K (While the FA goes to around 9K), so I felt it was neccessary to add the extra stability option, but yeah its prolly no biggie if I removed that option part and replaced it with the MARISHI for extra cooling.
Twin-Skies' perspective: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbQzIBfdCu8' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbQzIBfdCu8</a>
EDIT: Part 2
TS' view: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBS_O13CIQ8' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBS_O13CIQ8</a>
My view: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSmBRtpwkMo' target='_blank'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSmBRtpwkMo</a>
Yay! A fight vid!!! (More will be added soon. Twin-Skies also says hi to everyone, as he hasn't been able to post recently due to his work.)
Anyway, I changed the legs back to the FA and the EYE3 for the fight, as it allows for better mobility and EN defense, plus allowing the AC to go on to the offensive (I have to go all out against someone like TS), but it can easily be changed back to the EYE4 + 77A whenever I want to.
I'm actualy liking the MV2 because it really makes it harder for the opponent to dodge verts, meaning if you launch one it will get your opponent's attention, which buys the AC some time to get into the proper position to launch a barage of gunfire. On the otherhand, I use the KINNARA + GAR as a surprise-shotgun weapon at mid-short range or as a 'smoke screen' to hide other offensive strikes, the single lock of the KINNARA allows it to be deployed instanstaniously compared to the multi-lock NYMPH + RM3 which takes time before its able to launch a salvo. Well, I could also put ground trorps instead of the MV2 for anti-quad goodness
.As for option parts, the 77A has inferior stability compared to the FA at around 7K (While the FA goes to around 9K), so I felt it was neccessary to add the extra stability option, but yeah its prolly no biggie if I removed that option part and replaced it with the MARISHI for extra cooling.
