10-14-2006, 09:19 AM
I got thinking though... should the look of it really matter? Or more importantly, should our mascot be more of a representative of how we play (i.e., what parts we really use)? I think it's worth thinking about.
The parts you've all listed so far are useable really. It's the combination of parts in the end that will be the significant factor. But since that's decided by part popularity, I have to say this: if the final combination results in an AC that is quite iffy, we'll have to change some of the parts. Before you guys start saying "Nag vote pa tayo, eh papalitan lang pala sa huli," maliit na change lang naman ang gagawin eh, like a changing the head or one of the weapons only, so it's not that big of a deal. And judging by the current parts listed, that chance of an iffy AC is quite small.
Sorry ah, pero I want this thing to be really representative of us... not just something based on flashy and beautiful looking parts. I edited the my first post on this topic to show this.
One last thing: once again, bipeds are the most popular leg set. Oh, us whores. :tongue:
The parts you've all listed so far are useable really. It's the combination of parts in the end that will be the significant factor. But since that's decided by part popularity, I have to say this: if the final combination results in an AC that is quite iffy, we'll have to change some of the parts. Before you guys start saying "Nag vote pa tayo, eh papalitan lang pala sa huli," maliit na change lang naman ang gagawin eh, like a changing the head or one of the weapons only, so it's not that big of a deal. And judging by the current parts listed, that chance of an iffy AC is quite small.
Sorry ah, pero I want this thing to be really representative of us... not just something based on flashy and beautiful looking parts. I edited the my first post on this topic to show this.
One last thing: once again, bipeds are the most popular leg set. Oh, us whores. :tongue:
"Let's fight... like gentlemen." - Dudley, SF3
