06-10-2007, 03:52 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-NiX+June 10, 2007 12:17 am--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (NiX @ June 10, 2007 12:17 am)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> hahah alright man if you insist. 
But I must tell you that the really serious players have already analyzed their potential opponents (potential ACs included) LONG before the actual tournament.
Right Rick?
Oh and the letter-grading system in LR is generally deemed unreliable to begin with anyway so try not to rely on those ratings in gauging ACs.
[/quote:5fa82e8331]
I'm cool with the suggestion of viewing an opponent's AC at the begining of the match.
I'm 'trying' to anticipate everyone's designs, but I'm more inclined to have fun with my own tourney design at the moment. I'll still try not to disappoint however to those who are expecting a good match.
Also, I have been training a protege who's currently close to the level of some of the top players I've encountered. The person's been training for 3 weeks now from complete scratch, never touched AC before. PACT 2.1 will be about a month since the start of the training program.
But I must tell you that the really serious players have already analyzed their potential opponents (potential ACs included) LONG before the actual tournament.
Right Rick?
Oh and the letter-grading system in LR is generally deemed unreliable to begin with anyway so try not to rely on those ratings in gauging ACs.
[/quote:5fa82e8331]I'm cool with the suggestion of viewing an opponent's AC at the begining of the match.
I'm 'trying' to anticipate everyone's designs, but I'm more inclined to have fun with my own tourney design at the moment. I'll still try not to disappoint however to those who are expecting a good match.
Also, I have been training a protege who's currently close to the level of some of the top players I've encountered. The person's been training for 3 weeks now from complete scratch, never touched AC before. PACT 2.1 will be about a month since the start of the training program.
