Posts: 7,110
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2006
Steam: Grimlo9ic
Epic: Grimlo9ic
Battle.net: Grim#16773
As you may notice, I've been on an RR-retooling/upgrading spree lately. I guess knowing that there's a problem really gets to me. Ha.
Anyway, I want to get your opinion on this before I go ahead with it.
HTML is currently allowed in the forums. This is a pretty big security risk on its own. The link below is just one of the multitude of results you can get on Google.
http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=68184
Are you OK with turning HTML off? If we do, posting and embedding videos and personality test results won't be as easy anymore. We might have to resort to posting links that lead people to those videos instead, and using screenshots to show test results. God forbid.  Also, past posts will look really weird now that all that HTML code will be shown before your eyes (as they won't activate anymore).
Answer in the poll.
Thanks!
Posts: 9,097
Threads: 276
Joined: Sep 2006
Steam: nix_rr
Are there any other ways of regulating/limiting HTML usage?
Posts: 7,110
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2006
Steam: Grimlo9ic
Epic: Grimlo9ic
Battle.net: Grim#16773
(08-17-2010, 05:33 PM)NiX Wrote: Are there any other ways of regulating/limiting HTML usage?
I've been looking for ways to sanitize HTML input, but so far, there are none. Most boards have this turned off by default. Maybe it was wrong of me to condition us being used to having HTML. 
Posts: 9,097
Threads: 276
Joined: Sep 2006
Steam: nix_rr
Haha we're pretty obscure, I think. But anyway, if it truly is for the better, then I don't mind.
Posts: 5,321
Threads: 120
Joined: Aug 2006
08-17-2010, 10:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2010, 10:14 PM by Goat.)
Had to vote for yes. I think we're better off being safe than sorry, regardless of our "obscurity".
Hurrr Durr it rhymes
Edit:
I'd still prefer to use HTML though.
Posts: 7,110
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2006
Steam: Grimlo9ic
Epic: Grimlo9ic
Battle.net: Grim#16773
We're all pretty torn, including me. Obscurity was what I was thinking too. It's pretty much the only thing keeping us from chaos.
I'll give it another week. If no one posts any violent objections, we'll try turning it off for a month or so. Then we'll reevaluate.
Posts: 3,617
Threads: 122
Joined: Jun 2007
(08-18-2010, 01:56 PM)Grim Wrote: I'll give it another week. If no one posts any violent objections, we'll try turning it off for a month or so. Then we'll reevaluate.
Someone should post a violent objection for the sake of making a violent objection.
RR is turning into a hivemind.
Posts: 7,110
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2006
Steam: Grimlo9ic
Epic: Grimlo9ic
Battle.net: Grim#16773
(08-18-2010, 02:28 PM)Sforza Wrote: RR is turning into a hivemind.
Shit happens?
![[Image: 4qqa7wm.gif]](http://i1.tinypic.com/4qqa7wm.gif)
Posts: 6,281
Threads: 101
Joined: Aug 2006
08-19-2010, 06:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-19-2010, 06:44 AM by Serene.)
I'm kind of split between turning HTML off and on. I agree with giving a month's trial. What might happen though is almost everyone getting used to having it turned off. Basically, if we turn it off, we might as well live with it. Given that we take note of the pros and cons we experience. Leaving it on though will make it easier to view stuff for everyone.
Our older-older posts [three - four year old ones] already look messy. So it's either me make it look messier or leave them as is. << Just something I noticed.
'Signatures are overrated.'
Posts: 5,321
Threads: 120
Joined: Aug 2006
I think we'll need Raffy (the deviant XD) to post a biased/troll statement for NOU. D:
Posts: 6,052
Threads: 64
Joined: Feb 2007
08-20-2010, 12:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2010, 12:26 PM by clonezero.)
D:
wtf ?!
anyway from what I heard we just have to learn to do things a little differently but we do become more secure as a site in the process. I for one don't have any problems with that
anyway what those "NOU" stand for?
whargarrblwhargarrblwhargarrbl!
Posts: 3,617
Threads: 122
Joined: Jun 2007
(08-20-2010, 12:25 PM)clonezero Wrote: anyway what those "NOU" stand for?
NOU means NOU
Posts: 5,321
Threads: 120
Joined: Aug 2006
08-20-2010, 06:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2010, 06:55 PM by Goat.)
It's more of a shortcut for NOU (; i do not know where to put space), used for any comeback to any stupid/troll statement, which is supposed to be done satirically by you, where everyone will think otherwise and go for yes because of your 'planned-by-another-troll' troll comment.
I mustn't be making any sense, but regardless you must do as what you're programed to do.
Posts: 6,052
Threads: 64
Joined: Feb 2007
... you must construct additional pylons ...
whargarrblwhargarrblwhargarrbl!
Posts: 6,281
Threads: 101
Joined: Aug 2006
Putting this topic back on track...
Grim, is it possible make Turning the HTML on or off as an optional for threads instead?
'Signatures are overrated.'
|
