12-25-2006, 04:36 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-wanzerfreak+Dec 24 2006, 11:40 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (wanzerfreak @ Dec 24 2006, 11:40 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->You were expecting a good review but you went off like this because you thought everyone would like it. No one here is giving you a bad day. People tried to help you, but you're the one who is making it hard for yourself because you can't handle criticism. It's your fault, not ours.[/quote:4f8a9795b7]
I invite criticism in every way. I like to test the mettle of my AC on paper and in practice. But I don't think your idea of everyone 'being constructive' is accurrate whatsoever. I've been given harsh reviews simply because no one wants to try piloting any other way than the basic run-of-mill fashion.
What kind of reviews are those?! Those aren't reviews! Those are literally worthless one-sided statements that aren't benificial at all in any way!
Try USING the AC they way it's -supposed- to be used! Don't just use YOUR method of play and judge it from that, because you're not piloting it the way it is SUPPOSED to be piloted!
Is it really that hard for people to think outside of the box? I could go back and grab every single negative review based on one-sidedness, quote it all, and make it fill-out enough space to be considered a novel.
Really, it's almost at that point.
As much as I just -love- to listen to useless banter about how 'good' DINGO would do Delta Mk.II, that's just 100% garbage to the overall design.
Honestly, WHO WOULD SUGGEST legs that are meant for strategical combat due to their durability and lack of turning speed, on a design that requires absolutely high-end performance in maneuvering and mobility?!
I really mean that. WHO actually uses Delta Mk.II and finds the DINGO legs to be better?! C'mon, WHO actually went-out there, TRIED that garbage, and found it USEFUL for the overall design's playing style?!
Guess? No one! Because way to many people that have posted here like to be juking, backpealing, space-lovers! Horray for absolutely worthless suggestions that are default responses for almost any 'improvement' to an AC! You guys must like to say that for the heck of it.
Delta Mk.II isn't played the same way you guys like to play YOUR ACs! Figure that out yet? Of course not! Because you're all to busy being one-sided!
Wohoo!
Aside from the massive flaming, what are you people thinking? I'd really like to know, but none of you would give me an honest overall answer about the subject. You would all lie and think that everything you've ever posted was divine wisdom on this topic.
"Oh, I suggested DINGO, even though it ruins the design's needed mobility."
"Oh, I suggested the COUGAR2, even though it kills the EN drain by to much."
"Oh, I suggested using a radar head, even though the EN drain would suck."
"Oh, I suggested something that you already mentioned can't be replaced to begin with and why."
"Oh, I think I've been 'helpful' when all I did was criticize your design because it doesn't play the same way as all of my other run-of-the-mill ACs in my garage do."
"Oh, I said the YASYA sucks because I don't know how to use it or the AC you posted properly, and I don't care to even practice with it to know what the heck I'm talking about."
Is there -anyone- here who actually gave Delta Mk.II a test-run against a human opponent, used it like it was supposed to be used, and posted a USEFUL in-depth review on how it could be improved, or different tactics to consider with the YASYA?
No. There hasn't. At all.
All I see are people generating constant worst-case scenarios, and thinking that they'll happen every single time without fail. I see people doing -everything- they can to make Delta Mk.II look like it's of no use compared to their ever-loved ROTM (Run-Of-The-Mill) ACs.
In summary, an army of players that don't like me or my design simply because I don't agree with their one-sided opinions.
Go ahead and post anything you'd like, this topic died the moment everyone starting speweing out crappy 'reviews' of Delta Mk.II. This is just a flaming topic now, so indulge yourselves.
What do you think if that Waz? Still my fault? I'd like to call you a name, but I can't think of any word that eminates the 'full-of-crap-ness' that I'm looking for to describe you.
I invite criticism in every way. I like to test the mettle of my AC on paper and in practice. But I don't think your idea of everyone 'being constructive' is accurrate whatsoever. I've been given harsh reviews simply because no one wants to try piloting any other way than the basic run-of-mill fashion.
What kind of reviews are those?! Those aren't reviews! Those are literally worthless one-sided statements that aren't benificial at all in any way!
Try USING the AC they way it's -supposed- to be used! Don't just use YOUR method of play and judge it from that, because you're not piloting it the way it is SUPPOSED to be piloted!
Is it really that hard for people to think outside of the box? I could go back and grab every single negative review based on one-sidedness, quote it all, and make it fill-out enough space to be considered a novel.
Really, it's almost at that point.
As much as I just -love- to listen to useless banter about how 'good' DINGO would do Delta Mk.II, that's just 100% garbage to the overall design.
Honestly, WHO WOULD SUGGEST legs that are meant for strategical combat due to their durability and lack of turning speed, on a design that requires absolutely high-end performance in maneuvering and mobility?!
I really mean that. WHO actually uses Delta Mk.II and finds the DINGO legs to be better?! C'mon, WHO actually went-out there, TRIED that garbage, and found it USEFUL for the overall design's playing style?!
Guess? No one! Because way to many people that have posted here like to be juking, backpealing, space-lovers! Horray for absolutely worthless suggestions that are default responses for almost any 'improvement' to an AC! You guys must like to say that for the heck of it.
Delta Mk.II isn't played the same way you guys like to play YOUR ACs! Figure that out yet? Of course not! Because you're all to busy being one-sided!
Wohoo!
Aside from the massive flaming, what are you people thinking? I'd really like to know, but none of you would give me an honest overall answer about the subject. You would all lie and think that everything you've ever posted was divine wisdom on this topic.
"Oh, I suggested DINGO, even though it ruins the design's needed mobility."
"Oh, I suggested the COUGAR2, even though it kills the EN drain by to much."
"Oh, I suggested using a radar head, even though the EN drain would suck."
"Oh, I suggested something that you already mentioned can't be replaced to begin with and why."
"Oh, I think I've been 'helpful' when all I did was criticize your design because it doesn't play the same way as all of my other run-of-the-mill ACs in my garage do."
"Oh, I said the YASYA sucks because I don't know how to use it or the AC you posted properly, and I don't care to even practice with it to know what the heck I'm talking about."
Is there -anyone- here who actually gave Delta Mk.II a test-run against a human opponent, used it like it was supposed to be used, and posted a USEFUL in-depth review on how it could be improved, or different tactics to consider with the YASYA?
No. There hasn't. At all.
All I see are people generating constant worst-case scenarios, and thinking that they'll happen every single time without fail. I see people doing -everything- they can to make Delta Mk.II look like it's of no use compared to their ever-loved ROTM (Run-Of-The-Mill) ACs.
In summary, an army of players that don't like me or my design simply because I don't agree with their one-sided opinions.
Go ahead and post anything you'd like, this topic died the moment everyone starting speweing out crappy 'reviews' of Delta Mk.II. This is just a flaming topic now, so indulge yourselves.
What do you think if that Waz? Still my fault? I'd like to call you a name, but I can't think of any word that eminates the 'full-of-crap-ness' that I'm looking for to describe you.
My AC Garage:
