EA isn't so bad. Yeah they produce the mass-market games. So what? There's always going to be the biggest player in any game. EA Sports gets the bad rep it deserves, but EA Sports isn't EA.
The Need for Speed games are solid arcade racing titles. It's just that they deal with the popular (or is that unpopular?) tuner culture, so they get a lot of negative, anti-ricer arguments. Burnout's another example of a good franchise.
Yes, we know it will be beaten by StarCraft 2, but who here has played Red Alert 3 to really have a definitive say on whether it's good or bad?
Also, The Sims. Spore. Maxis. Will Wright. Bad? I hardly think so.
---
No, I don't work for EA, and probably never will. I just don't like to see a whole company's name being smeared just because it's a big corporation, or because one of its divisions rehashes sports games year after year.
The Need for Speed games are solid arcade racing titles. It's just that they deal with the popular (or is that unpopular?) tuner culture, so they get a lot of negative, anti-ricer arguments. Burnout's another example of a good franchise.
Yes, we know it will be beaten by StarCraft 2, but who here has played Red Alert 3 to really have a definitive say on whether it's good or bad?
Also, The Sims. Spore. Maxis. Will Wright. Bad? I hardly think so.
---
No, I don't work for EA, and probably never will. I just don't like to see a whole company's name being smeared just because it's a big corporation, or because one of its divisions rehashes sports games year after year.
"Let's fight... like gentlemen." - Dudley, SF3
