02-25-2007, 03:12 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Goatling+Feb 25 2007, 01:22 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Goatling @ Feb 25 2007, 01:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I'm just wondering though. Since I'm not really good with the GAR2+NYMPHE, is it better to keep GAR2 or should I probably change it into RM3? [/quote:3df4be96c5]
I won't say mine is totaly better, I'd say its my preference. Some people would gladly trade 200 defense points for an extra 50KPH.
Up to you on the missiles. I don't see how one can't be good with the GAR/2 + NYMPHE or the RM3 for that matter, its a pretty basic, and almost fool-proof missile system. I think the GAR + NYMPHE is enough though, as anything more would mean changes in other parts to accomodate the heavier RM3.
I won't say mine is totaly better, I'd say its my preference. Some people would gladly trade 200 defense points for an extra 50KPH.
Up to you on the missiles. I don't see how one can't be good with the GAR/2 + NYMPHE or the RM3 for that matter, its a pretty basic, and almost fool-proof missile system. I think the GAR + NYMPHE is enough though, as anything more would mean changes in other parts to accomodate the heavier RM3.
