Imagination Garage

[clonezero]

<!--QuoteBegin-Serene+Feb 18 2007, 12:03 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serene @ Feb 18 2007, 12:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I know shell weapons don't have energy drain...
But Elie needs energy to shoot...

It's designed after WarInc's railgun weapon design...
Sayang lang wala akong makita sa net nun...

Some things from the Wikipedia:

A Railgun is a type of Magnetic Accelerator Gun (MAG) that utilizes an electromagnetic force to propel an electrically conductive projectile that is initially part of the current path. Sometimes they also use a movable armature connecting the rails. The current flowing through the rails sets up a magnetic field between them and through the projectile perpendicularly to the current in it. This results in the rails and the projectile pushing each other and in the acceleration of the projectile along the rails.

Railguns are being pursued as weapons with projectiles that do not contain explosives, but are given extremely high velocities: 3500 m/s (11,500 ft/s) or more (for comparison, the M16 rifle has a muzzle speed of m/s, or 3,000 ft/s), which would make their kinetic energy equal or superior to the energy yield of an explosive-filled shell of greater mass. This would allow more ammunition to be carried and eliminate the hazards of carrying explosives in a tank or naval weapons platform. Also, by firing at higher velocities railguns have greater range, less bullet drop and less wind drift, bypassing the inherent cost and physical limitations of conventional firearms - "the limits of gas expansion prohibit launching an unassisted projectile to velocities greater than about 1.5 km/s and ranges of more than 50 miles [80 km] from a practical conventional gun system."[1]

If it is ever possible to apply the technology as a rapid-fire automatic weapon, a railgun would have further advantages in increased rate of fire. The feed mechanisms of a conventional firearm must move to accommodate the propellant charge as well as the ammunition round, while a railgun would only need to accommodate the projectile. Furthermore, a railgun would not have to extract a spent cartridge case from the breech, meaning that a fresh round could be cycled almost immediately after the previous round has been shot.

Currently the U.S. Navy is using the rail gun concept for a cheaper and more effective projectile capability, as stated by the January 29, 2007 edition of NavyTimes

So in one way...
Tama yung design ko...

EDIT:
Added the Sayuri Machinegun...
and the ChibiDa Pulse Rifle...
Yum...

Sa totoo lang, I'm curious...
Why are AC's Pulse Rifles pistol size? [/quote:6d8c3fe6fc]
I agree boss! for a long time know I've been a fan of EM weaponry and has always been wondering why the linear gun and rail gun were made as different weapons (there the same IMO!) and as you have explained rail guns and the like (all in the category of Elecetro -Magnetically proppeled weaponry) are solid weaponry that takes up ALOT of energy

the U.S.m navy first tested the idea on the sea shadow. stealth + gun ERASER gun = ouch

... if AC already have linear guns and rail guns where are the gauss rifles???