02-16-2007, 06:01 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Lord_Leperman+Feb 16 2007, 11:58 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lord_Leperman @ Feb 16 2007, 11:58 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> The SILKY has poor usage drain that rivals the SHADE per shot, weighs a lot, and does pretty much what the M2 MG does, only worse.
I would use the SILKY IF:
1. It had a usage drain less than 500 points.
2. It does not spread its shots at all. (I mean, is the beam lens on that gun wobbly?)
3. Greater than 200 points of ammo (I'd say the same for other MGs like the M2 considering their stats right now.) [/quote:42c53178fa]
Sounds like you want a toned down MG-500/E...
Same here Lord Rick...
To CloneZero:
We have no idea...
Anyway...
A few things From could have done or substituted for an energy machinegun:
I would use the SILKY IF:
1. It had a usage drain less than 500 points.
2. It does not spread its shots at all. (I mean, is the beam lens on that gun wobbly?)
3. Greater than 200 points of ammo (I'd say the same for other MGs like the M2 considering their stats right now.) [/quote:42c53178fa]
Sounds like you want a toned down MG-500/E...
Same here Lord Rick...
To CloneZero:
We have no idea...
Anyway...
A few things From could have done or substituted for an energy machinegun:
'Signatures are overrated.'
