12-22-2006, 12:27 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-HayWire+Dec 22 2006, 10:57 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (HayWire @ Dec 22 2006, 10:57 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> do you have a substitute for the OB cores? [/quote:ad5cbcd777]
U2, U3 are U4 are good midweight-class cores (non-OB with hangars).
99UL, as Grim said, is a good all-around LW, non-OB core. As a bonus, it has a low energy drain, which is good for this AC.
MW EOs:
GAEA is a decent EO core. Unlimited EO ammo + energy attack + it has 18ops slots (and consequently, upgrades for the Shade would affect the EOs too). Decent DEF and energy drain. It has no AMS and is a bit drainy, though.
89E, on the otherhand, is like the solid-EO counterpart of GAEA. Good points: Low drain, high DEF, EO doesn't consume energy, and has AMS. Low points: EO is limited (so you'd have to manage the ammo), 17 ops slots (a downside for ACs that need a lot of ops slots), and, IIRC, is kinda heavy.
U2, U3 are U4 are good midweight-class cores (non-OB with hangars).
99UL, as Grim said, is a good all-around LW, non-OB core. As a bonus, it has a low energy drain, which is good for this AC.
MW EOs:
GAEA is a decent EO core. Unlimited EO ammo + energy attack + it has 18ops slots (and consequently, upgrades for the Shade would affect the EOs too). Decent DEF and energy drain. It has no AMS and is a bit drainy, though.
89E, on the otherhand, is like the solid-EO counterpart of GAEA. Good points: Low drain, high DEF, EO doesn't consume energy, and has AMS. Low points: EO is limited (so you'd have to manage the ammo), 17 ops slots (a downside for ACs that need a lot of ops slots), and, IIRC, is kinda heavy.
"Numbers are not part of the real world; they're part of something else."
-Prof. Rolly Panopio, UPLB Math Division
-Prof. Rolly Panopio, UPLB Math Division
