12-02-2006, 01:45 AM
Alright, after some SERIOUS testing, Mix, Tim, Rick, and I unanimously agree that...
<span style='font-size:30pt;line-height:100%'>FLAMETHROWERS ARE UTTER UTTER GARBAGE.</span>
1. They don't lock.
2. Because it's nearly impossible to engulf an AC in napalm long enough, it's highly unlikely that you'll be able to cause an overheat.
3. Even if you manage to cause an overheat, it's still hard to maintain the heat of the opponent.
4. Heating is pretty much all that flamethrowers are good for... the shell damage it causes is completely negligible.
5. Too many other reasons that make it teh suxxorz.
<span style='font-size:30pt;line-height:100%'>FLAMETHROWERS ARE UTTER UTTER GARBAGE.</span>
1. They don't lock.
2. Because it's nearly impossible to engulf an AC in napalm long enough, it's highly unlikely that you'll be able to cause an overheat.
3. Even if you manage to cause an overheat, it's still hard to maintain the heat of the opponent.
4. Heating is pretty much all that flamethrowers are good for... the shell damage it causes is completely negligible.
5. Too many other reasons that make it teh suxxorz.
