10-06-2006, 09:06 PM
Yeah, your right about the SELLENA being inaccurate. The EOS does sound tempting along with the FUDOH/LOTUS + GULL (Although I want the FUDOH a lot more). Unfortunately, I think I've lost my touch with OB designs so the change might be bad for me... on the otherhand, I could re-learn OB again for the sake of better range control.
As for the missiles, I'd prefer something that allows me to control range like the MVs which have an indirect tragectory, forcing opponents to close in, and allowing for the AC to 'possibly' sneak up on an opponent's range game. The 69M + RM3 kinnda feels redundant with the KINNARA and the BP on the left hand as direct fire weapons, although I see where you're coming from. On a side note, the 69M + BP sounds like a nice idea if used in conjunction with each other.
Sad thing about the design though, the JACKAL2 just seems to carry too much risks for it to be a competitive part as much as I like the way the AC looks with it (This is not to say that the JACKAL2 is a bad part, but the alternatives like the FA and 81AP legs look better on paper).
As for the missiles, I'd prefer something that allows me to control range like the MVs which have an indirect tragectory, forcing opponents to close in, and allowing for the AC to 'possibly' sneak up on an opponent's range game. The 69M + RM3 kinnda feels redundant with the KINNARA and the BP on the left hand as direct fire weapons, although I see where you're coming from. On a side note, the 69M + BP sounds like a nice idea if used in conjunction with each other.
Sad thing about the design though, the JACKAL2 just seems to carry too much risks for it to be a competitive part as much as I like the way the AC looks with it (This is not to say that the JACKAL2 is a bad part, but the alternatives like the FA and 81AP legs look better on paper).
