+- The Raven Republic Forums (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Forum: Assembly (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Forum: P.A.C.T. (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two (/showthread.php?tid=1895)
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - NiX - 03-01-2010
The dudes doing the AC1 demo were horrible.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Serene - 03-01-2010
we could limit the extension bans to just 1 per kind. Or at least the ones with the least usage limits...
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - NiX - 03-01-2010
What do you mean by one per kind?
And I was hoping for a short list. And shortlisting is a pain. Unless someone other than me will be doing it.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - J.E_Magog - 03-01-2010
eh. just use the previous bans on extensions.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Moonlight_Raven - 03-01-2010
but LR is Armored Core...therefore _____________ 
(peace...) just in my mind, for extension bans...
energy packs
relation missiles
allow shields, ext. boosters, extra ammo magazines (solid and energy), anti-missiles.
just a suggestion.
=^.^=
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - clonezero - 03-01-2010
well considering that extra ammo has been around since PP (albeit on the back) I think its ok to keep it.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Serene - 03-01-2010
just the energy based AMS ext would be good. Extra pressure
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - NiX - 03-01-2010
What's the rationale behind your suggestions?
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Serene - 03-01-2010
A good amount of ammo, limited by it's firing drain per shot. The more missiles it intercept, the more energy you lose.
But it's lightweight.
I really can't make a short list right now. But I will when I can.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - J.E_Magog - 03-01-2010
Don't forget that ACs will be getting lighter now that they won't be carrying too much on the left arm. Now banning RMs but allowing AMS will reduce missiles to what---
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Moonlight_Raven - 03-01-2010
toink... i forgot that thing, sorry guys 
sorry NiX...um...extensions bans
energy packs - ...
relation missiles - to not spam and have the 69M + ....
anti-missiles (solid & energy based) - to make back unit missiles hit.
then allow extra ammo magazines (right, they're present since ACPP, and it doesn't hurt, and to have the solid & laser rifles.. an extra punch), shields & extension boosters.
& yes, underweighting will be easy here...
chasing scenario. 
=^.^=
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - NiX - 03-01-2010
(02-25-2010, 06:44 PM)NiX Wrote: Yup, all the other PACT rules are still in effect.
But let me post a summary anyway (all still up for discussion).
[b]Banned:
ECM pods - resolved
H3 handguns - resolved
HARPY2 - resolved
TP Boosters - resolved
All left arm equipment other than blades and shields (An extra blade or shield may still be hangered)
Cannot hanger ROC4 and HP - resolved
For discussion:
LORIS arms (except on tanks?) (edit: and hovers?)
LEMUR2 arms (except on tanks?) (edit: and hovers?)
ALL EXTENSIONS
UA Core
- Can hanger a right-hand weapon ONLY IF USING TANK LEGS (and hovers?)
ROC4 Pulse Rifle
- CANNOT be hangered
HP Handgun
(2)CANNOT be hangered
How's that?
ADDED 2/27/10: NO TUNING OF FRAME PARTS.
Can we just vote regarding this EXTENSIONS thing? Either ban none or ban all. Reply with your vote. We'll just count manually.
I vote to keep them on. Designing feels bland without the extensions. It becomes an arm-weapon war. And I'd argue that tanks pretty much need JIREN.
Now how about all the other items on the list?
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Goat - 03-01-2010
Blocking all the extensions or vice versa is a bit too much imo. I still prefer having a longer list.
About the extensions; None-or-All, or: (Disregard if you're still aiming for either none or all.)
I'd pick NO EXTENSIONS if there aren't any choices left though.
As for the other stuff quoted, I'm fine with it either way. ACs will be much faster with the left arm gun restrictions.
Edit: All in all, it feels like playing Godzilla.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - Mjting - 03-01-2010
I saw first hand how limited bipeds are without them.
VOTED KEEP EXTENSIONS.
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - NiX - 03-01-2010
Hey Mark, what exactly did you mean by allow all?