The Raven Republic Forums
LR: PACT 3 Rules - Printable Version

+- The Raven Republic Forums (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Forum: Assembly (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Forum: P.A.C.T. (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: LR: PACT 3 Rules (/showthread.php?tid=965)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

- Lord_Leperman - 07-23-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-NiX+July 17, 2007 10:29 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (NiX @ July 17, 2007 10:29 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> 3. The ACs in your garage should have NO, as in ZERO, common parts EXCEPT for optional parts.

EDIT - Yes, that includes EVERYTHING. Even the FCS, Radiator, Generator, and Booster. Yes, only one AC can have ANANDA.

EDIT - Para sa mga pilosopo: Whether it's the right or left back weapon, that still counts as the same weapon. So if you have a left KARURA on one AC and a right KARURA on another, that's still breaking the rule. But you can have, let's say, two KARURAs on the same AC. Just not on your others. [/quote:792b02c1d3]
What about for hand mounts? Say one equips the 69H in the left hanger on one AC and equips it on the right hand on the other, how would that configuration count? Tongue I'm trying to maximize the rules. BTW, and I already have created 5 ACs at the moment each using a unique set of parts, based on the rules, from one another.

- Jack-O - 07-23-2007

Umm, about the dual Karura, is it ok??, and if an AC wins the batle, walang palitan(parang change the loser AC) anyway I still have to study some other rules.

- Serene - 07-23-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-Lord_Leperman+July 23, 2007 06:38 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (Lord_Leperman @ July 23, 2007 06:38 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-NiX+July 17, 2007 10:29 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (NiX @ July 17, 2007 10:29 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> 3. The ACs in your garage should have NO, as in ZERO, common parts EXCEPT for optional parts.

EDIT - Yes, that includes EVERYTHING. Even the FCS, Radiator, Generator, and Booster. Yes, only one AC can have ANANDA.

EDIT - Para sa mga pilosopo: Whether it's the right or left back weapon, that still counts as the same weapon. So if you have a left KARURA on one AC and a right KARURA on another, that's still breaking the rule. But you can have, let's say, two KARURAs on the same AC. Just not on your others. [/quote:180bc2ccc3]
What about for hand mounts? Say one equips the 69H in the left hanger on one AC and equips it on the right hand on the other, how would that configuration count? Tongue I'm trying to maximize the rules. BTW, and I already have created 5 ACs at the moment each using a unique set of parts, based on the rules, from one another. [/quote:180bc2ccc3]
Well, Ako wala nang problema dyan.
Happy I do things that way, kaso nga lang different humanoid legs.
I could adjust though.

To Jack-O:
Happy Pag sinabing bawala ng dual, bawal ang dual.

- NiX - 07-23-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-Lord_Leperman+July 23, 2007 04:38 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (Lord_Leperman @ July 23, 2007 04:38 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> What about for hand mounts? Say one equips the 69H in the left hanger on one AC and equips it on the right hand on the other, how would that configuration count? Tongue [/quote:2ee957214a]
Sa akin okay lang ang ganun. But what does everyone else think?

- Goat - 07-23-2007

I'd agree on that too. My ACs have different parts anyway.

- Serene - 07-24-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-NiX+July 23, 2007 09:32 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (NiX @ July 23, 2007 09:32 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-Lord_Leperman+July 23, 2007 04:38 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (Lord_Leperman @ July 23, 2007 04:38 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> What about for hand mounts? Say one equips the 69H in the left hanger on one AC and equips it on the right hand on the other, how would that configuration count? Tongue [/quote:47ae124fef]
Sa akin okay lang ang ganun. But what does everyone else think? [/quote:47ae124fef]
As long as they're not in the same location, Ok lang siguro...
Basta one of the AC's have the weapon in the hanger.

- Lord_Leperman - 07-29-2007

I went out of the way and constructed 5 distinct ACs, all with different parts. It proved to be a very big design challenge on my part as most of the basic essentials given are evenly spread out or risk using sub-standard parts (I was forced to use the HAZEL and the LAUREL radiators eventually). Play styles are also varied and are heavily dependent on the FCS choice; I'm now forced to make rushers, jousters, flyers, range control specialists, and all purpose ACs with varied weaponry for each (although theoretically you can use similar parts for similar play style ACs such as the 4 known vert-missile launchers).

For one, it takes a lot of time to micro-manage your parts as one can't simply slap all the best known parts on one AC only to leave another AC with less than useful parts. Pretty much adds a whole new dimension to AC designing.

- NiX - 07-29-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-Lord_Leperman+July 29, 2007 09:16 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (Lord_Leperman @ July 29, 2007 09:16 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I went out of the way and constructed 5 distinct ACs, all with different parts. It proved to be a very big design challenge on my part as most of the basic essentials given are evenly spread out or risk using sub-standard parts (I was forced to use the HAZEL and the LAUREL radiators eventually). Play styles are also varied and are heavily dependent on the FCS choice; I'm now forced to make rushers, jousters, flyers, range control specialists, and all purpose ACs with varied weaponry for each (although theoretically you can use similar parts for similar play style ACs such as the 4 known vert-missile launchers).

For one, it takes a lot of time to micro-manage your parts as one can't simply slap all the best known parts on one AC only to leave another AC with less than useful parts. Pretty much adds a whole new dimension to AC designing. [/quote:d423af1cb3]
You mean this as a good thing, right? Tongue

- Grim - 09-23-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-NiX+ 23 2007, 07:32 PM--><div class='codebox_title'></b> (NiX @ 23 2007, 07:32 PM)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-Lord_Leperman+July 23, 2007 04:38 pm--><div class='codebox_title'><b> (Lord_Leperman @ July 23, 2007 04:38 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> What about for hand mounts? Say one equips the 69H in the left hanger on one AC and equips it on the right hand on the other, how would that configuration count? Tongue [/quote:9043c478b5]
Sa akin okay lang ang ganun. But what does everyone else think? [/quote:9043c478b5]
Bringing this topic back for scrutiny...

I'm OK with this idea too. But it has an inherent danger being that all of your hangers can be 69Hs. While it's still legal (by my understanding), let's try to steer away from being 69H-centric on all 3 designs.

- azuma-blade - 09-24-2007

aw puro humanoid legs lng gamit ko jake punta ako sa inyo sa lunes para mag practice quad or any legs pede b?

- Sforza - 09-24-2007

<!--QuoteBegin-azuma-blade+ 24 2007, 02:13 AM--><div class='codebox_title'><b></b> (azuma-blade @ 24 2007, 02:13 AM)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> aw puro humanoid legs lng gamit ko jake punta ako sa inyo sa lunes para mag practice quad or any legs pede b? [/quote:6a97699029]
Okay lang pero may pupuntahan ako mga 5. Tsaka isa lang pala ung control pad ko, kaya walang kwenta din pumunta kung wala tayong 2nd controller LOL

To the others: sorry for the OT, the pm and assistant tags are missing for some reason, and so is a lot of the UI for the forums.

RE: Proposal for new PACT format - clonezero - 09-27-2007

Serene Wrote:To Jack-O:
Happy Pag sinabing bawala ng dual, bawal ang dual.


Oh crap I just noticed ... one of my designs has dual 69hs waaaah ...

RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Grim - 09-27-2007

clonezero Wrote:
Serene Wrote:To Jack-O:
Happy Pag sinabing bawala ng dual, bawal ang dual.


Oh crap I just noticed ... one of my designs has dual 69hs waaaah ...

Man, you've gotta read the fine print. No one's contested this rule so far:

NiX Wrote:EDIT - Para sa mga pilosopo: Whether it's the right or left back weapon, that still counts as the same weapon. So if you have a left KARURA on one AC and a right KARURA on another, that's still breaking the rule. But you can have, let's say, two KARURAs on the same AC. Just not on your others.


RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Serene - 09-27-2007

you can have 2 karuras on one ac, then you can't have your other ac's equipped with the karuras anymore.

RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Moonlight_Raven - 09-27-2007

um... with the new format, it will add up to a more diversity of AC designs. I wished that part bans will be revamped (hehe... make TP legal... Roll eyes)


=^.^=