+- The Raven Republic Forums (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Forum: Assembly (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Forum: P.A.C.T. (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: Future PACT? (/showthread.php?tid=1810)
RE: Future PACT? - clonezero - 05-28-2009
quad hp those seem deadly when done right but its also a gamble dont you think XD
anyway mukhang lr nga pero wag namang tawaging sayonara lr XP
RE: Future PACT? - Serene - 06-08-2009
If both players from the same team do focus fire on one player, It means the other player is free and can attack one opponent attacking his teammate/wingman.
It's like:
A1+A2 >> B1
B1 >> A1orA2
B2 >> A1orA2
HP's will be a problem if they can be hangered. Kaso hindi eh. So basically, we can use our current part regulations on 2on2.
Mas mabagal lang pag masyadong maraming missiles. That's why I think it's better to just enforce a launch limit kahit wala nang bans.
RE: Future PACT? - maitreya - 06-08-2009
Even if one guy is free, if two players can properly quad-HP an AC, it'll easily that down that AC. It's like four rapid-fire rifles with high breaking damage (HP does have rifle damage.. high-end solid rifle damage). Well, it's for testing as usual. Nothing's certain until there are test results.
RE: Future PACT? - NiX - 06-08-2009
I'm actually ok with that.
I don't think we should be bothering too much with balance anymore at this point in time. It'll be more for fun, right?
RE: Future PACT? - maitreya - 06-08-2009
Sana mauilit yun flamethrower/Yasya four AC free-for-all.
RE: Future PACT? - Serene - 06-15-2009
We did a 2on2 against 2 AI units las friday.
Walang problema sa regulations...
Just enforce a no part repeat rule, para wala nang problema with dual nix's, HP's and etc...
Ok na after that.
RE: Future PACT? - Mjting - 06-15-2009
I want another lr PACt too.
kinda miss playing it already
RE: Future PACT? - NiX - 06-15-2009
What kind of no-repeating-parts rule?
As in dapat walang common parts between the 2 team mates? Sounds good to me.
EDIT: but in that case, dapat magkampihan na para makagawa na ng team ACs.
RE: Future PACT? - Sforza - 06-15-2009
Would you guys be interested in having another PACT during BYOB2?
It can be our send-off party for LR.
The event can now be BYOB2/PACT5/3rd RR Aniv!!
RE: Future PACT? - Lord_Leperman - 06-15-2009
Yeah, sige. One last one before we prolly move on to different games/platforms.
PACT 3 or 4 rules good enough or would you guys want to go for the classic 1 AC per person on a best of 3 (or 5) double elimination format like in PACT4 (which IMO gives ample opportunities for everyone to participate)? I'm all for it as long as we use the double elimination format used in PACT4.
RE: Future PACT? - Shintetsu - 06-15-2009
Can you guys add something fun to the tourney? Like the aforementioned Yasya rumble?
Just something for the people who don't really play AC. Just plain AC fun.
RE: Future PACT? - NiX - 06-15-2009
Suggestion lang.
Kung 8 players sumali:
Bunutan kung block a/block b ka. 4 people per block.
block a, 4-way free-for-all. block b, 4-way free-for-all.
Natira sa block a, laban sa natira sa block b.
winner = champion.
Kailangan divisible by 4 ang sumali.
If not, kahit 3-way ffa sa isang block ok lang. Nakatungangang default AC nalang yung 4th player.
--------------
Tutal for fun na lang naman ito diba. So kung 4-way ffa, sobrang random na talaga and skill won't be that big a deal. Fun na lang talaga ang focus.
This'll probably allow for some really unexpected finalists.
RE: Future PACT? - Mjting - 06-15-2009
why call it a sendoff thing naman for Lr? imho it's still more fun than Fa.
RE: Future PACT? - NiX - 06-15-2009
Ganun eh. People always want something newer. Even if new isn't necessarily better. Buhay nga naman.
RE: Future PACT? - Mjting - 06-15-2009
heh, if fun is the premise, then why not fewer restrictions then? altho still ban the imba stuff.