+- The Raven Republic Forums (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Forum: Assembly (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Forum: P.A.C.T. (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: PACT Regulations for LR (/showthread.php?tid=274)
- Grim - 06-14-2007
<!--QuoteBegin-beastkiller+June 13, 2007 08:09 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (beastkiller @ June 13, 2007 08:09 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> di pa at updated yan di pa kasama ung mga minodefied na rules [/quote:32b07d30fe]
Updated now. Rick's suggestions on simplifying the Loris/Lemur2 and TP booster qualifications were never really discussed though, but as the rules currently stand, I'm already OK with them.
- maitreya - 06-14-2007
This is kinda late, but anyway...
On the UA Core
Our current rules state that UA can hangar allowable hangered guns if it is on a tank legset (excluding LHT), otherwise it can only hangar blades on nontanks and nonLHT. I was wondering, how about on hovers? Will UA with hangarable guns on hovers be considered bannable material? UA's superb heat resistance and def can make up for the high booster heat of hovers and their lower def, which can make hovers more usable.
I dunno the practicality of using a hover, but it's always good to have more options for people.
- Grim - 06-14-2007
UA with hangers on hovers sounds fair to me. It does indeed boost the usability of ACs on hovers, if not on the strength of their legs then at least at the strength of their cores. Anyone else think the same?
- Serene - 06-14-2007
Here I am.
Sounds good.
More people will use hovers now.
- NiX - 06-14-2007
I'm okay with that one about the hovers too
- otakuwarren - 06-14-2007
i dont have a beef with that too
- Jack-O - 06-14-2007
Anyway I do not appoved on TP and the booster with the red boost(nakalimutan ko name eh, geez I hate Crests name their parts) and i just suggest to ban any napalm and flamethrowers, they cause high heats( It's up to you if you do) anyway the UA core is banned with Hanger weapons????
- maitreya - 06-14-2007
<!--QuoteBegin-Jack-O+June 14, 2007 05:00 pm--><div class='codebox_title'>QUOTE (Jack-O @ June 14, 2007 05:00 pm)</div><div class='codebox'><div id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> ... anyway the UA core is banned with Hanger weapons???? [/quote:6087b0fcf9]
UA (with any legset) can hangar blades.
UA on tanks (excluding LHT) can hangar guns.
UA on everything else can only hangar blades; no guns allowed.
- EtherMaster_X102A - 06-15-2007
na co-confuse ako about the issue of TP, Is TP really banned? or TP is only uses for parrying blades only?. Please give me the whole details regaring this issue.
- otakuwarren - 06-15-2007
hala patay ka dave.. hahah! oo pwede ung nilaban mo saken..
tp users must have blades sa left arm na hindi hangered.
- maitreya - 06-17-2007
PACT 2.1 on-the-spot modification of rules: the "no-start" rule has been modified to no pressing of the start button only on the first round of a match. It then becomes optional on latter rounds.
Suggestions after 2.1:
a) No more restrictions/bans on hovers.
b) Players will be allowed to have a substitute AC. In other words, players can switch ACs between battles. (Side note: The player has a main AC. So (maybe) the player can only substitute only after his first round against a player.)
- NiX - 06-17-2007
I'm for those.
Except maybe the one on hovers... a UA, LORIS, TP hover sounds nasty. Will have to be tested for abusability though
- maitreya - 06-17-2007
Hovers don't have boosters, so TPs not a question. And currently, I believe UA with hangars on hovers is legal? But with the UA + Loris/Lemur2 (+ Pegasus?) combo...? Yeah, let's test it first.
- NiX - 06-17-2007
Super-rusher hover with LORIS/LEMUR2, UA, PEGASUS and dual hangered HPs to boot? That just may be what it takes to make a hover competitive.
- maitreya - 06-17-2007
Type A + ECM + Dual H3 with Hangared HP... Yup...