Current time: 06-02-2024, 11:50 PM
PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two
The extensions and tuning issues aren't even up for discussion anymore. We've decided to keep them. It was only an idea thrown in the air.

I am not a committee. I'm just a loud voice on this thread, but I don't decide for this community. And very few care enough to even bother to voice out an opinion. So far with have 2 for E2 and 2 against it. Either way, it isn't a huge deal to me.

I checked out Momo's LR rules for 2-on-2

Google translated:
Quote:"Map game"
・以下の MAPよりランダムで選択。 The following, randomly selected from MAP. (重複なし) (No Duplicates)
01.CYBER SPACE 01.CYBER SPACE
02.MILITARY DISTRICT 02.MILITARY DISTRICT
03.BORN CITY 03.BORN CITY


<制限事項> "Limitations"
・装備禁止     ECMメーカー全種     マイクロミサイル全種     オービットキャノン全種     コンテナミサイル全種     左手銃器(ブレード・ロケット・シールドは可能) ECM features all kinds left firearms, prohibited missiles Obittokyanon container species all species all species all micro missile manufacturers (rocket shield blades are available)

・ブースター制限     B83TP・VULTURE・VULTURE2・GULL・B90T2の装備不可。 , Limit booster B83TP · VULTURE · VULTURE2 · GULL · B90T2 not equipment.
中量二脚・重量二脚は、更にBIRDIE2を装備できない。 Amount of weight during the two legs two legs are not equipped with BIRDIE2 further.

・1チーム内で、いずれか1つを利用できる。 , One in the team, one can use either one.
但し、タンクかフロートが装備しているものについては数えない。 However, it is found that the tank is equipped with floats or does not count.
武器腕(SYURAは除く) Arms weapons (SYURA not included)
CR-WR73RS CR-WR73RS
各種ミサイル(連動ミサイルとの併用可能) Various missiles (missiles and can be linked together)
WB31B-PEGASUS WB31B-PEGASUS
EOコア(C02-URANUSは除く) EO core (C02-URANUS not included)

They do employ a 1-per-team EO rule. But they've also slowed the game down by limiting the boosters. They also seem to have a rule about missiles and extensions, but I don't really get the translation. EDIT: Apparently, they also limited missiles packs of any kind (+ extensions) to 1 person per team. Makes sense to me too since heavier ACs just melt under dual RM3 bombardment.

Oh and from reading that, I just remembered that we'll also thin down the map selection to about the same as theirs. We tested and found that it's those maps that lag the least.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 08-03-2009, 11:46 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 08-03-2009, 12:41 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 08-05-2009, 11:48 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 08-09-2009, 10:15 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-24-2010, 11:30 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 08-11-2009, 10:53 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 11-11-2009, 02:51 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-24-2010, 12:33 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-24-2010, 04:52 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Grim - 02-24-2010, 04:55 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-24-2010, 05:10 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-24-2010, 05:49 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-24-2010, 05:56 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 09:21 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 12:30 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 03:01 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Grim - 02-25-2010, 03:58 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 04:52 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 05:39 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 06:05 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 02-25-2010, 06:13 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 06:44 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-01-2010, 07:56 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 02-25-2010, 07:27 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-25-2010, 09:21 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 02-26-2010, 07:41 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-26-2010, 09:42 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-26-2010, 10:12 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-27-2010, 12:30 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 02-27-2010, 06:14 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Grim - 02-27-2010, 09:56 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-27-2010, 10:32 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-28-2010, 04:58 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 02-28-2010, 09:02 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-01-2010, 09:51 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-01-2010, 12:02 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-01-2010, 02:21 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Goat - 03-01-2010, 08:30 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-01-2010, 09:24 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Fox - 03-01-2010, 10:44 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Grim - 03-01-2010, 11:58 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 03-02-2010, 03:35 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-02-2010, 03:47 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-03-2010, 10:39 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-06-2010, 02:37 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 03-07-2010, 08:05 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-08-2010, 10:29 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Niji - 03-14-2010, 02:10 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-14-2010, 11:44 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-15-2010, 11:08 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-15-2010, 12:02 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-17-2010, 10:27 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 03-20-2010, 01:00 AM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 04-03-2010, 09:23 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 04-04-2010, 10:23 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 09-02-2010, 04:39 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by Goat - 09-02-2010, 06:56 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 09-05-2010, 12:25 PM
RE: PACT Regulations for LR Two-on-Two - by NiX - 10-22-2010, 09:42 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PACT Regulations - ACV 1.01 NiX 51 65,978 06-14-2012, 09:05 AM
Last Post: NiX
  ACV PACT NiX 8 13,664 05-08-2012, 07:11 PM
Last Post: farmboy28
  PACT VI NiX 295 329,484 02-25-2012, 02:35 PM
Last Post: Shintetsu
  PACT Regulations for LR NiX 316 394,821 12-18-2011, 12:40 PM
Last Post: atdsutm
  PACT 6 NiX 36 47,624 01-21-2011, 05:46 PM
Last Post: beastkiller
  PACT 5 Discussion Thread NiX 87 139,136 08-05-2009, 10:38 PM
Last Post: Grim
  Future PACT? maitreya 35 40,584 06-17-2009, 03:57 PM
Last Post: Shintetsu
  PACT 4 - Let's go RAVENS! NiX 164 223,166 06-25-2008, 06:44 PM
Last Post: Serene
  LR PACT: Ban Harpy 2? NiX 5 11,119 05-05-2008, 08:44 PM
Last Post: NiX
  LR PACT: Limit Conditionally Banned Parts? NiX 2 7,082 05-05-2008, 08:43 PM
Last Post: NiX

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)