+- The Raven Republic Forums (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Community (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Forum: Assembly (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Forum: P.A.C.T. (https://ravenrepublic.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: LR: PACT 3 Rules (/showthread.php?tid=965)
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - clonezero - 09-27-2007
Im sorry I was still sleepy when I posted ... I'll try reading more of the previous post before posting again >_<
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - NiX - 09-27-2007
I just realized though, won't it be a headache to check for the legality of everyone's 3 ACs?
Honor system to save time? Hahah
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Serene - 09-27-2007
Pwede rin...
Marshalls would be checking 3 ac's per person...
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Grim - 09-28-2007
NiX Wrote:I just realized though, won't it be a headache to check for the legality of everyone's 3 ACs?
Honor system to save time? Hahah
In our experience, everyone's been pretty "honorable" so far. Haha.
We should trust everyone's intelligence. Because if they don't, they'll get disqualified.
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Serene - 09-28-2007
Aruy...
So basically, everyone should triple check their AC's and make sure that no rules have been broken in coming up and building up their designs.
Masaya yun...
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - NiX - 09-28-2007
Okay sounds good. That should definitely save time. But it would really be best if everyone arrives on time or if we start early
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - clonezero - 09-28-2007
that has been my mentality since the anniv ... which I think was the reason why haywire and the other two who turned me into a guinea pig had a field day with me I was not prepared for singles combat I was geared for my bloody battle with serene >_<
excuses I know but still ...
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Serene - 09-28-2007
We can always have a rematch Zero...
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - clonezero - 09-28-2007
yup yup at pact 3!!!!
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Sforza - 09-28-2007
We could just vote to disqualify Rick and have him check the ACs beforehand, through email submission.
Rick can be the hidden super boss battle for the champion to challenge, where his 3 designs will be 2 from the last tournaments, and the one he uses for Godzilla matches.
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - NiX - 09-28-2007
LOLOLOL that'd work too.
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Lord_Leperman - 09-29-2007
I'm alright with that really. I'll probably do it if people want me to :p
Oh in case you're interested. Most of the parts of Halimaw, Himitsu-Heiki, and Genbu are exclusive to each other (the only difference being the HP, EYE3, ANANDA, and F73H but that can easily be worked around with), so It'll be plausible. This is not to say that I'll be using these ACs if ever I join the tournament, expect fresh designs from me when I participate :p.
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - NiX - 09-30-2007
Wow I just finished making 3 unique ACs for the upcoming tournament. I'm very satisfied with their performance against the AI but I still need to test them out against a human just to be sure.
It wasn't too hard mixing the external parts and weapons around but man was it tough distributing the internal parts. I ended up having to use the 2nd generator as well as the HAZEL radiators
Choosing the right FCS for each AC was a pain too.I really like this new format.
I'm really looking forward to everyone's designs hahahaP.S. Should we keep the "Must change AC after every round/match" or should we follow the suggestion to allow the winner of a previous round to reuse the same AC?
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - clonezero - 09-30-2007
well we could go ala pokemon ... 3 ACs per side when one goes down the loser gets to choose the next AC he uses ... objective is to defeat all 3 poke ... I mean ACs a player has ... problem ... potentially longer battles...
RE: Proposal for new PACT format - Grim - 09-30-2007
NiX Wrote:P.S. Should we keep the "Must change AC after every round/match" or should we follow the suggestion to allow the winner of a previous round to reuse the same AC?
I think we should force an AC change after every round. If a player keeps playing and winning with one AC it totally defeats the purpose of building three. Sure privileges must go to the winners, but that's their privilege in itself: they advance.
If we do it through Raffy's suggestion that's a problem: every match-up becomes a best of five. That'll take a long time to finish.